Werewolf: Round 4

SirGuy wrote:

Jman wrote:Hence, the reason I am not stooping to your level

Woah. This game is getting intense. Well, anyone who wants to die can gladly come play in my graveyard...

Do I get a special story when I die too?

Jman wrote:

SirGuy wrote:

Jman wrote:Hence, the reason I am not stooping to your level

Woah. This game is getting intense. Well, anyone who wants to die can gladly come play in my graveyard...

Do I get a special story when I die too?

If you want. PM me so i dont forget. . Their fun to write. xD

I did agree to compromise and I voted for deviant originally. That's me trusting you.
You on the contrary kept attacking my idea over and over asking questions to things I already gave answers to.

And yes. If he did that, that is over stepping.
If he came on the forums and said that same thing, "This plan would be apocalyptic to the villagers" would be him given his voice to a side or not. How are you not seeing that?

If you didn't like the idea, fine, you vote against it. But then you keep going on and on offering an alternative here or another way to do things there does not get us to our goal. Time is the one critical factor that is NOT on our side in this game.

But ok. I'm done. I'll go sit back and watch since you and I will disagree no matter what. I'm not going to be surprised if Deviant is a wolf, doesn't change anything else though. I'll even vote (again) for him.

Slade wrote:I'm not going to be surprised if Deviant is a wolf, doesn't change anything else though.

I don't see how it doesn't change anything. Do you really think if I was a wolf I would go about killing my team mates whenever I get the chance? Now that's illogical.


Also, Providence didn't really overstep his boundaries at all. He's not incriminating anyone, but instead simply talking out against a system. All he meant by it being apocalyptic is that IF a wolf compromised the leadership, THEN it would be apocalyptic. That's not overstepping. It's just common sense.


No worries though. I'm done too.

Nick Fury sees your attempts to get the last word in and counters with humor.

That was a 3 page discussion. Woah. I hope you 2 are done. Upped your post count by quite a bit there...

Still haven't gotten that pm... IF ANYONE WANTS A DEATH STORY, PM ME! Keeping it small so hopefully, Providence doesn't notice.

Two can play at that game.

EDIT: Sirguy I pm'd you. But yeah, still my regular old narwhal self.

Are you 2 really in a lol fight?

SirGuy wrote:Are you 2 really in a lol fight?

Not really, I'm just Chuck Testa after all.

Can't wait for 7 pm tonight... I WANNA WRITE ANOTHER DEATH STORY... xD

Can my love of writing death stories be considered emo?

SirGuy wrote:Can't wait for 7 pm tonight... I WANNA WRITE ANOTHER DEATH STORY... xD

Can my love of writing death stories be considered emo?

Check yo messages, son! And After reading everything (even though I think this debate is over), I'm actually agreeing more with Jman. Unfortunately I can't be on here all the time so I get quite a lot of information in one sitting! My vote is for Deviant.

So after a 3 page cumulative argument, it's come to my attention that we haven't made any headway as to who we suspect as wolves. This being said i kindly ask anybody with any interesting theory as to why somebody isn't fully trustworthy to please come forward and give you reasons. I don't want any i vote for ____ because of my previous reasons we now have a 3pg block of an argument to get through to see those reasons, so just restate them.

Or you could go 3 pages back and re-read the evidence.

Here is my original post, even though you claim it's "not evidence at all"...

Jman wrote:My evidence against deviant and wquist are relatively similar. First of all, I've seen both of them on during the night cycles without posting anything. Second, deviant and wquist convenianty waited to post right before they were going to be auto-lynched. Furthermore, wquist and deviant coincidentally didn't vote for orange08, who I was pretty sure was a wolf at the time.

I think you could agree with me that their behavior is rather shady, to say the least.

Successfully bagging 2 wolves in 2 days would prove to be awesome for the villagers.


Also, it's interesting that of all people, the wolves choose snail. Looks like the beast has a personal vendetta or something.

Regardless of how convincing you think the evidence is, I don't see anyone else suggesting a better target.

Jman wrote:

Regardless of how convincing you think the evidence is, I don't see anyone else suggesting a better target.

actually captainkraft had a vote i would like elaborating on, and i'm not fully against your claim yet, i just want to see if anybody else has anything they want to say before we jump the gun.

Also, just as an update to everyone, TheCat100 is now out of town but they have left procedures for me to follow telling me who to lynchvote daily in their stead.
Today, TheCat100 votes that deviant is lynched.

CaptainKraft wrote:You guys are funny...

Clearly neither of you are getting anywhere. Not enough of the community is voicing their opinion, so nothing is going to happen other than incriminating yourselves (falsely or not).

Let's just see if anyone else votes yes or no... if not, we can't do anything about it.

P.S. I still maintain Chaosfaction is a wolf, let's lynch him

I don't think hes a wolf so ill keep my vote for deviant but his constant accusing of me, and cosine makes me suspicous of him.

Voting for Deviant due to lack of thinking and time to analyze the situation properly. Wish I had more time >.<

Edit: I think Cristopher Paolini might be a wolf...

Providence wrote:Also, just as an update to everyone, TheCat100 is now out of town but they have left procedures for me to follow telling me who to lynchvote daily in their stead.
Today, TheCat100 votes that deviant is lynched.

Wait what, he already posted his vote for today.

See:

Providence was simply restating the fact that he voted.

markmarkadam wrote:So after a 3 page cumulative argument, it's come to my attention that we haven't made any headway as to who we suspect as wolves. This being said i kindly ask anybody with any interesting theory as to why somebody isn't fully trustworthy to please come forward and give you reasons. I don't want any i vote for ____ because of my previous reasons we now have a 3pg block of an argument to get through to see those reasons, so just restate them.

MYVOTE: chaosfaction

He was way too quick to start condemning people. He must have nothing to lose (read, he must be a werewolf) YOU DIE!
-------------------------------------------------------------
chaosfaction wrote:Damn 11? Sorry orange I tryed.
Everyone vote for Adamwang! A vote for adamwang is a vote for your favorite noun!

Interesting how he openly defends a (now) known wolf... I had a suspicion from the start, I'm going back to my first instinct.

I smell fur and fangs...
-------------------------------------------------------------
chaosfaction wrote:I defended orange because I thought it unlikely he was a villager so then killing someone who would be auto lynched anyways would be safer. and in general i felt bad that someone who actually played would get booted for being a little suspicous.


The faster the wolves die, the faster us villagers will be triumphant... you are becoming more and more suspicious with every feeble defense wolfy!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicious posts by Choasfaction:

I defended orange because I thought it unlikely he was a villager so then killing someone who would be auto lynched anyways would be safer. and in general i felt bad that someone who actually played would get booted for being a little suspicous.

Damn 11? Sorry orange I tryed.
Everyone vote for Adamwang! A vote for adamwang is a vote for your favorite noun!

Snail makes a good point lets have mercy on poor orange I'll start a new bandwagon for a different inactive player so Adamwang Is who I choose to die at random


All of this, plus his very suspicious rebuttals throughout the game. So very fish to me...

DEFINITELY is an obvious stretch, I just like to be aggressive.

P.S. I'm also leaning towards cosine... I haven't had trig in a while, but does that mean sine is also suspicious?
-------------------------------------------------------------

FYI, If you want to see what anyone said in the past, go to their profile, then statistics, then to view all posts. Copy/pasting all that sucked haha!

Guess I'll jump on the bandwagon with what little evidence Jman has proposed. deviant has my vote.

I agree with CaptainKraft... I vote for chaosfaction. I don't think that being online at night is enough to condemn someone as a wolf...

if i recall wquist, arent you amongst the accused? along with deviant.

chaosfaction wrote:if i recall wquist, arent you amongst the accused? along with deviant.

This is true.

chaosfaction wrote:if i recall wquist, arent you amongst the accused? along with deviant.

Accused of being online at night... that's it. Guilt by association is apparently the only argument we have against deviant and wquist, and I can't at all see how that's fair.

I vote chaosfaction, because like captainkraft, I've also had my qualms about him from the very beginning, due to his immidiate accusations and defense of orange08, a known wolf. I'm aware that the evidence is shaky, but in my mind it's a good deal less shaky than the evidence against either deviant or wquist.