Werewolf: Round 4

SirGuy wrote:

Jman wrote:
Yes. Please excuse me for helping to kill half of the wolves. I'm so sorry for being such a nub please forgive me master villager, sir.

SO WHAT? Now you have gone low enough to include ME into your arguments??????

Oh the cruelty! Oh the horror! Oh the mastery!

I am totally making a joke here... lol

I shot you in the head stop being alive.

Jman wrote:

SirGuy wrote:

Jman wrote:
Yes. Please excuse me for helping to kill half of the wolves. I'm so sorry for being such a nub please forgive me master villager, sir.

SO WHAT? Now you have gone low enough to include ME into your arguments??????

Oh the cruelty! Oh the horror! Oh the mastery!

I am totally making a joke here... lol

I shot you in the head stop being alive.

Ahh, but you didnt post it in the forums, thus it doesnt count. So...

Also, you still have a knife in ur gut. Sorry bro

EAT ALL THE WATERMELONS!!!

In the grand scheme of things we are all just yokles.

Unknown3 wrote:sine, if this message of yours truly was sent to you before vapid's death, why would he not post it himself or, why didnt you post this from before. seeing how neither of you did these things, i come to the conclusion that these statements are inaccurate and comes from a wolf trying to deliberately frame a villager (which i must say is brilliant if it is), or vapid is giving inaccurate information after he died, which is vote-influencing as seen with the two votes on me, which is breaking the rule on this forum, which i formally request from both providence and snail to investigate into.

As for my defense, i do not recall this conversation with said "person #2," and mind everyone who doesnt know me, i have a pretty good memory. as for the actuality of me being a wolf, anyone please answer this question, if i did not log on during the night cycle, how can i be a wolf?

i didnt post before because vapid wasnt dead and he was handling the issue himself and i posted now because he cant help me out with talking to me anymore and making strategy. as for his reason he said he cant tell anymore. but i will post the screenshot with date to prove after i finish driving back from talahasee which will be well before this night ends

ok i got it this is the evidence

taken away to be improved

Wow, thats some evidence. It doesnt give names, times, or any other thing linking it to you...

SirGuy wrote:Wow, thats some evidence. It doesnt give names, times, or any other thing linking it to you...

ok then tell me how i can do it without exposing real life info

open it in MS Paint and then write the character names over the actual names haha

Slade wrote:open it in MS Paint and then write the character names over the actual names haha

Agreed

Just as a heads up to you all, I'm going to be out of the house and rather busy at 7 tonight and so I will be forced to end night earlier and from my phone. This means that as soon as I receive in the last wolf votes night will end early. Prepare yourselves.

Sorry guys, on my phone. Snail, I'd appreciate it if you could do all the fancy formattin'...

Night has ended.
PELIGRO the Mason died overnight.

Day now begins.
Yall have 24 hours to do yo thang. Best of luck to you all. Day ends 7 PM EST.

Man this sucks, I'm just gonna vote CaptainKraft, not sure if Beast or just horrible guess.

Voting Unknown3 as he is a solid lead through investigatory methods.

Keep in mind I may change my vote over the night/tomorrow if motivated to do so LOL.

BUT- I see ZERO evidence against Kraft and he's never been suspicious so I would strongly not recommend voting for him (unless it's for him to dance.. boy can that man shake it).

I would like to also hear arguments for/against

Chartreuse
Zed
blah2355

if people feel like actually playing the game that is.

Slade wrote:Voting Unknown3 as he is a solid lead through investigatory methods.

Keep in mind I may change my vote over the night/tomorrow if motivated to do so LOL.

BUT- I see ZERO evidence against Kraft and he's never been suspicious so I would strongly not recommend voting for him (unless it's for him to dance.. boy can that man shake it).

I would like to also hear arguments for/against

Chartreuse
Zed
blah2355

if people feel like actually playing the game that is.

there is some pretty solid evidence against unknown3 but there isnt "no" evidence against CaptainKraft. he was scryed with a 75% chance of being a wolf wich is more tangible than any investigations so my vote is for captainkraft. if he dies and is not a wolf i will go for unknown next.

I am voting for captainkraft because of the 75% scried. As for the evidence against or for me being a wolf, there are none on each side. I wouldn't count voting for a normal villager as evidence considering that we are playing a game where no one knows who the wolves are. Also, it's kind of impossible to prove that i'm a villager without screenshot-ting the pm which is against the game rules.

I can't argue against the Scry.

But folks.. click on his name and view all of his posts. Look to see if he's ACTED like a wolf or like a villager.
Kraft was on the chopping block over a week ago and we decided he was fine because his votes make no sense if he's a wolf.

He's a villager.

I'm not forcing you to vote for any person in particular- I'm just saying you should not vote for Kraft. It's a waste of a cycle. Read through his posts. Judge properly that way.

If you do that and then STILL vote for him without further reasoning, the rest of us can only assume you are trying to eliminate villagers, as you did with your LAST TWO VOTES.

Seriously guys- be careful.

You have voted off two villagers in a row now (I have voted for neither of them). Perhaps you should begin to use a different method of determining if someone is a wolf? Look at the evidence. Look at the posts. See what a person does. a 3/4 chance does not outweigh you using actual reason.

Slade wrote:I can't argue against the Scry.

But folks.. click on his name and view all of his posts. Look to see if he's ACTED like a wolf or like a villager.
Kraft was on the chopping block over a week ago and we decided he was fine because his votes make no sense if he's a wolf.

He's a villager.

I'm not forcing you to vote for any person in particular- I'm just saying you should not vote for Kraft. It's a waste of a cycle. Read through his posts. Judge properly that way.

If you do that and then STILL vote for him without further reasoning, the rest of us can only assume you are trying to eliminate villagers, as you did with your LAST TWO VOTES.

Seriously guys- be careful.

You have voted off two villagers in a row now (I have voted for neither of them). Perhaps you should begin to use a different method of determining if someone is a wolf? Look at the evidence. Look at the posts. See what a person does. a 3/4 chance does not outweigh you using actual reason.

the past several day cycles I have always voted for CaptainKraft. so no blood on my hands.

Slade wrote:open it in MS Paint and then write the character names over the actual names haha

ok ill do that should i wait until tomorrow morning and remake it too because it will be old enough that facebook will turn the date from just saying the weekday to the date i think

unknown3 too

CaptainKraft sounds good. I'd suggest you others go with this as well. Makes a lot of sense, if you ask me.

jakobs98 wrote:CaptainKraft sounds good. I'd suggest you others go with this as well. Makes a lot of sense, if you ask me.

..right..

can you explain any part of that that makes sense.

you must mean the way he's voted right? no..

Ok then you are talking about the things he's said.. like being caught lying.. no?

oh.. OH then you must mean that the log on activity he has.. no not that?

Then surely PLEASE explain how this makes "A LOT" of sense- because right now it fully appears that you're full of it.

"I like the 75% odds" is one thing. "This makes a lot of sense, everyone else vote for it" is totally different.

edit: emphasis with capitalization mine.

Slade wrote:

jakobs98 wrote:CaptainKraft sounds good. I'd suggest you others go with this as well. Makes a lot of sense, if you ask me.

"I like the 75% odds" is one thing. "This makes a lot of sense, everyone else vote for it" is totally different.

That's what I meant with makes a lot of sense. What's up all the rage anyway?
Edit: Also, stop faking quotes. I never capitalised "a lot". I never said "everyone else vote for it" and it's not the same as "I'd suggest you other fo with this as well."

jakobs98 wrote:

Slade wrote:

jakobs98 wrote:CaptainKraft sounds good. I'd suggest you others go with this as well. Makes a lot of sense, if you ask me.

"I like the 75% odds" is one thing. "This makes a lot of sense, everyone else vote for it" is totally different.

That's what I meant with makes a lot of sense. What's up all the rage anyway?
Edit: Also, stop faking quotes. I never capitalised "a lot". I never said "everyone else vote for it" and it's not the same as "I'd suggest you other fo with this as well."

I was meaning to emphasize that you are saying it makes a lot of sense.

when it does not make a lot of sense.


and I guess the rage is that in all the games i've played people actually play and post and communicate.. this is a social game. But in this instance you guys have voted for villager after villager because the villagers aren't thinking or discussing things at all they are just blindly voting, not realizing the wolves are the ones they are following.

so it's annoying because you guys are about to vote for another villager and you all refuse to look at any evidence besides a 75% scry- no one but JMAN and myself have been even trying to do anything this game (besides Vapid who played for like 20 seconds)

The wolves are playing by not playing, which is weaksauce.
The villagers are only bandwagoning.
Zed, who is the best analyst among you is only organizing and posting, not actually saying anything - which is a good strategy if he is a wolf because people think he's contributing when really he's only cataloging, but would be a huge red flag is most games.

So yea, rage. Because when I play a game it pisses me off when the people I am forced to team up with 1/4 ass everything.

Yes, it's just a game. Yes it's meaningless. But then why are you bothering to play if you're not going to try or participate?

/end rant

see ya after 7

Slade wrote:

jakobs98 wrote:

Slade wrote:

jakobs98 wrote:CaptainKraft sounds good. I'd suggest you others go with this as well. Makes a lot of sense, if you ask me.

"I like the 75% odds" is one thing. "This makes a lot of sense, everyone else vote for it" is totally different.

That's what I meant with makes a lot of sense. What's up all the rage anyway?
Edit: Also, stop faking quotes. I never capitalised "a lot". I never said "everyone else vote for it" and it's not the same as "I'd suggest you other fo with this as well."

I was meaning to emphasize that you are saying it makes a lot of sense.

when it does not make a lot of sense.


and I guess the rage is that in all the games i've played people actually play and post and communicate.. this is a social game. But in this instance you guys have voted for villager after villager because the villagers aren't thinking or discussing things at all they are just blindly voting, not realizing the wolves are the ones they are following.

so it's annoying because you guys are about to vote for another villager and you all refuse to look at any evidence besides a 75% scry- no one but JMAN and myself have been even trying to do anything this game (besides Vapid who played for like 20 seconds)

The wolves are playing by not playing, which is weaksauce.
The villagers are only bandwagoning.
Zed, who is the best analyst among you is only organizing and posting, not actually saying anything - which is a good strategy if he is a wolf because people think he's contributing when really he's only cataloging, but would be a huge red flag is most games.

So yea, rage. Because when I play a game it pisses me off when the people I am forced to team up with 1/4 ass everything.

Yes, it's just a game. Yes it's meaningless. But then why are you bothering to play if you're not going to try or participate?

/end rant

see ya after 7

condescending but most of it is true.

Round Four Has Ended.

Neither wolves nor villagers win. Danger successfully detonated their nuke after fleeing the town, and was the only survivor. She alone has won the game.

And now, an explanation:

When this round was gearing to start up, I found myself browsing the internet one night, and I came across a thread that also was simulating this very same game. Their game, instead of werewolves vs. villagers, actually focused on the theme of rebel insurgents infiltrated among a military base. It was not only amusing to read over, but brought to my attention a most peculiar and exciting role: the nuclear terrorist. The nuclear terrorist indeed is on the minority bad guy team, but should they successfully detonate their nuke, they alone win the whole game. The nuclear terrorist also has the ability to fake their own death. In addition, because nobody ever knows of secret nuclear plots, their role is to remain an absolute secret until their demise.

When the mob "killed" Danger, she in actuality simply armed her nuke. The rules of a successful nuke is that she cannot be stopped over the 8-day countdown clock. In order to be stopped, a scryer must find her out. Every night after the arming of said nuke, a scry (even if not directed at Danger) had a 35% chance to uncover her plot. If she were discovered, her nuke would be deactivated and Danger would be killed for real. It would seem fate were on her side, and Danger was never discovered.

I would like to thank you all for playing, and it has been an honor serving you all as your host. Stay tuned tomorrow to read the postmortem where we have strategy reviews, story closure, and all that good stuff.