Werewolf: Round 4

chaosfaction wrote::/ if it was working he wouldn't be accused by everybody

lololol
we arent supposed to see through it

the fact that he accused me (100% villager, and no evidence to the contrary) is very suspicious. my final vote probably goes to jman

NOT THE WAREWOLF wrote:
the fact that he accused me (100% villager, and no evidence to the contrary) is very suspicious. my final vote probably goes to jman

COME AT ME BRO. COME AT ME.

I am so confused by all of you i kind of want to shoot myself in the face then have a toddler pee on me just for good measure.

Vapid is saying the same exact arguement i had on day 4(i think) and everyone was like NNOOOO. Not possible!!! He'd never sacrifice another wolf.
Now a week later everyones all up in Jmans junk and nothings changed since then.
Back then i said i wasnt sure, but it was SAFE to take him out just in case since we didnt have any better leads and all of you jumped on me for it
Now you are all saying ITS SAFE to kill him just in case!

Sorry but ya'll done lost your mind.


I vote for zed cuz i was using the outhouse this morning just after he did and i looked in to the hole when i entered and the things i saw in there could ONLY have been left by a very powerful werewolf.

edit: it was too many burritos.

I am voting for Zed Di Dragon as well.

Slade wrote: zed cuz i was using the outhouse this morning just after he did and i looked in to the hole when i entered and the things i saw in there could ONLY have been left by a very powerful werewolf.

Dafuq did I just read?
P.S. WOOHOO 100TH POST!

Slade wrote:I am so confused by all of you i kind of want to shoot myself in the face then have a toddler pee on me just for good measure.

Vapid is saying the same exact arguement i had on day 4(i think) and everyone was like NNOOOO. Not possible!!! He'd never sacrifice another wolf.
Now a week later everyones all up in Jmans junk and nothings changed since then.
Back then i said i wasnt sure, but it was SAFE to take him out just in case since we didnt have any better leads and all of you jumped on me for it
Now you are all saying ITS SAFE to kill him just in case!

Some things have changed. Jman's potentially effective alliance has fallen apart, mostly by wolf claws, and 2 of jman close "allies" died consecutively. Theres nothing left to risk by killing him.

Also, my identities out, im gunna die, and i no longer give a shit.

still looking over the past two days events... jman you are one courageous villager; even though the evidence on you seems to reason out in a sense, i still dont buy it... the chances that someone found three wolves in the first three nights and chooses to sacrifice them is beyond me why its reasonable, but two dead scries in a row and now a baner is the part that have me at a conundrum. nevertheless, i still have my trust in jman, but i will not submit my vote just yet until i am certain with what my findings from the previous two days bring me.

Why would the wolves kill off the villagers who were supporting the wolf?

If Jman were a wolf, wouldnt he coordinate to make sure the wolves DO NOT kill off the villagers who were his strongest defenders? (alpha)

Im not argueing for you to or to not vote for the guy. Just making sure you know what youre doing.

In a PM to Me Vapid Seraphim wrote:There's a reason I pushed my sword so deeply with twenty-one hours remaining to withdraw it.

Now, while I am still rather certain that you are in connection with or are yourself some malevolent element, you have yielded the disastrous, esoteric shroud of "Trust me," and the position of authority. This, while potentially a boon when actually unified, only serves to stifle the efforts of a majority left alienated and isolated. Rather than thinking for themselves and seeking logical courses of action when defeating the wolves, the hierarchy you created on your conjectures with little base other than trust pushed the general population towards collaborating with your effort as to escape the eye of scrutiny. In effect, you sought reduce myriad brains to one, on which you based the hopes of the entire human population.

Whether your actions prove flawed optimism or malevolent, we're now where we need to be. Proposing our own theories, not being led. We cannot live on hunches and trust any longer. You are true that this is a dire moment, and in it we can only trust our empiricism.

Now, as far as actually driving the blade of justice right in our remaining time, the case must be raised against Zed Di Dragon, for I am certain of his orchestration of this plot. An original backer, I've seen, of this, "Inactive wolves," witch hunt himself, and an ironic almost non-contributor despite claiming he'd forward his best efforts doing so(Have you seen him think?) AND from what I've heard quite the wit. I've been tracking the logs. He's been hanging back, hidden not posting.

So, should you agree to reveal the reasoning behind your hunches for now on, and relinquish the demagoguery, I shall withdraw my accusations for the meantime in favor of Zed.

God damn you are so confusing . I have no idea what's going on anymore, but I think zed is the beast or devil.

Do what you'd all like. I already said I am okay with being lynched at this point lol. New school week, new responsibilities.

Slade wrote:Why would the wolves kill off the villagers who were supporting the wolf?

If Jman were a wolf, wouldnt he coordinate to make sure the wolves DO NOT kill off the villagers who were his strongest defenders?

Im not argueing for you to or to not vote for the guy. Just making sure you know what youre doing.

Maybe they decided it was time to kill of his "allies" while he was still alive and had influence over what the other baner and i did each night. He would kill off the key villagers eventual with an evil plan. why not then?

As detailed above, my vote shifts to Zed Di Dragon.

Suspicions are no longer good enough. We all need to think, we all need to contribute, we all need to resist falling into the shadow of secrecy and complacency. With Jman's regime of mysterious hunches shattered, we can concentrate on the facts.

i must say i am confused slade, are you defending jman now, even though you practically led a crusade against him before?

also boba was right, with jman a wolf, it could be that he will kill off the scries just so he could get closer to the baners to trust them. but gaining the scries and baners trust through the methods of sacrificing three wolves is what still bothers me. not the fact that it was 3/8 of the wolf team that he took down single-handedly, it was also during days 2-4. thus the chances of him connecting with all three wolves is very plausible but still more improbable. hence why i still believe jman is a villager.

as for zed, i do find him very suspicious, but i would like to gather my own findings before i vote. as jman said, we have to hit the beast today so the wolves cant kill the baner.

jman and his many, duping "lists of suspects" need to die

On page 12, post 168 of Round 2, Zed Di Dragon posted the following:

Lack of participation is a good reason not to lynch someone. They'll get their ass killed on their own!

Yet the fellow supported the same methodology this game! Also, if you look back at his prior games, you'll see his activity has evolved significantly. His reasoning isn't being employed on our side, so one begins to wonder whether it is being employed towards our demise.

And I'm not psudo-dropping out.

What an interesting day this is turning out to be.

Jman, that's a pretty impressive list you've got there. I know it must be pretty accurate because mine is very similar to it. I'd figured out Bobabow, Cosine and wquist some days ago, even. How? Simple observation. This is the lynch votes on day 1:

Spoiler:

As you can see, Cosine and Bobabow voted on the same person on day 1. From this I could conclude that Boba had to be Cosine's baner after Cosine died.

Cosine, then? Voted Danger on days 2 and 4, after he had presumably scried him. You'll notice that Boba again voted the same here. What's interesting about cay 2 is that at that point we should be through with random lynchings and hunches like "Danger sounds Dangerous". No, Cosine had proof by that point, and that's why he started the Danger-wagon on day 2.

wquist was easy. Jman exposed him on day 3.

esque the neutral was easily deduced after QuantumVM died.

For the longest time I'd thought CaptainKraft and Slade were masons. The theory of my third masons, RedOctober, kinda fell away when he died and turned out not to be one. .-. It was only when, to my complete and total surprise I might add, Risque was revealed to be a mason upon her death that I looked at PELIGRO and WowzerAnne and noticed how those three had been pretty tight through the game.

When Vapid said I hadn't done any thinking, he was of course wrong. These were the things I thought up, but since none of this had uncovered any wolves I couldn't really do anything with it.

So no, those three being attacked in a row doesn't have to chalk up to it having to be Jman. It could be literally anyone with an intelligence higher than that of a sponge. I'm as certain of Jman's innocence as I am of my own.


Vapid Seraphim: Please speak like a normal person. There's adding flavour to your language and then there's dumping an entire glass of spice on a stale sandwich.

Vapid Seraphim wrote:On page 12, post 168 of Round 2, Zed Di Dragon posted the following:

Lack of participation is a good reason not to lynch someone. They'll get their ass killed on their own!

Yet the fellow supported the same methodology this game!

Now, since you're so good at paying attention you might've noticed the post where I had already explained this. The method was suggested to me this time around by Snail.

Slade wrote:I vote for zed cuz i was using the outhouse this morning just after he did and i looked in to the hole when i entered and the things i saw in there could ONLY have been left by a very powerful werewolf.

I had eight burritos that morning. I may have a problem.

Vapid Seraphim wrote: Their status on the memberlist updates to: "Last time online: Unknown." Therefore, it is nigh impossible that a hidden player enter without capturing notice. You are correct though that some additional persons could be on: The ones whom maintain a hidden online status indefinitely. Of them, the only player in the current game is Zed Di Dragon. So that just sets our list up one man, whom has already shown himself to be an individual of questionable intent

Vapid Seraphim, translated wrote:The only current player set to hidden is Zed. That's very suspicious!

I set my status to hidden long before Round 1 even started. This was to protect myself in case I should turn out to be a baner or a wolf. I advice the rest of the of players to do the same before next round.

Up until a couple of days ago, Jman seemed very certain of my innocence. What changed? My bandwagon against Risque. I'll just put this plainly: I had no idea Risque was a mason before she died. If I did, there's no way I would've led that wagon. It wouldn't make sense from the perspective of a villager and it would make even less sense from the perspective of a wolf. Think about a little. Look at the situation in which I find myself right now. People are out for my head now. And for what? A mason? I could maybe do something reckless like lead a bandwagon against a baner because that'd be worth it. But a mason?

A god damned mason?

I'm not angry. Only disappointed. In myself.

I am a dead unbiased source. I hope you guys think about changing the bandwagon theory.

Mod edit: Please refrain from influencing votes when dead kthnx. Leaving the last bit because it's unbiased enough.

Risque... Pretty sure u cant do that

Also.

I wanted to see who spoke up for zed.

Now I know


edit: spelling

jakobs98 is likely to be a wolf.

I speak with Jakobs98 on a daily basis; if that kid was a wolf, I think I'd know.

Vapid Seraphim wrote:And I'm psudo-dropping out. Thought I'd enjoy this lil' dealie, but it's too stressful and too time consuming 'fer me to expend brain-juice on. Autovote me for Zed every day until he dies or I die, then Chartreuse.

Adios! Used what I've pieced together wisely and you guys'll make it.

And keep thinking.

Wow... thanks for coming in the game, using language that just makes people angry that they have to read it, and then not even participating...

Next time, don't come in this late in the game if you aren't going to do anything. You could have just watched the ending...

As for my vote, I'm going with Jakobs.

My suspicion of JMan has diminished because he asked for us villagers to PM him explaining our innocence. I PM'd him, and he immediately took me off the wolf list and put me on the villager list. He has also defended bobabow to me in the past guaranteeing to me that he is innocent.

If JMan was a wolf, he would not have done this.

Zed Di Dragon wrote:I speak with Jakobs98 on a daily basis; if that kid was a wolf, I think I'd know.

Or you are a wolf and you are trying not to get your kind killed off...

Risque wrote:UNBIASED SOURCE TO THE RESCUE. I hope you guys think about changing the bandwagon theory.

AHHHH It's a zombie!!!

Chop its head off!

Zed Di Dragon wrote:I speak with Jakobs98 on a daily basis; if that kid was a wolf, I think I'd know.

Who do you propose? I'd rather kill him than you.

What are the current votes?