Werewolf: Round 4

Bobabow wrote:Zed especially has been very quiet recently after some suspicious actions early on.

Forgive me for having a survival instinct; after people started crying out for my head during the first couple of days I simply found it wiser to lean back and keep still. Since Jman seems to be pulling of an excellent job I see no need to do anything drastic of my own.

If there are other accusation from which I need to defend myself then feel free to bring them up. Otherwise I'll just fall in line and see what happens when we lynch wquist.

Edit: Oh right the thing where I wanted to lynch people getting autolynched? That was a suggestion provided to me by ThatSnail. I have no idea if it's against the rules for him to simply confirm this. I think Jakobs98 was there at the time and can back me up on this, but nontheless I will paste the chatlogs here after my exams today.

Zed Di Dragon wrote:Edit: Oh right the thing where I wanted to lynch people getting autolynched? That was a suggestion provided to me by ThatSnail. I have no idea if it's against the rules for him to simply confirm this. I think Jakobs98 was there at the time and can back me up on this, but nontheless I will paste the chatlogs here after my exams today.

I can confirm this too. Plus, it was logical.

I won't be voting today.

by the way, what happened to all those people that were going to be autolynched? i know you extended the time, but im pretty sure not everyone has been active. It does get announced i assume?

RedOctober wrote:I won't be voting today.

LOL
_______________________

wquist it is then

I vote wquist

Jman wrote:]Sticks in the shadows with lacking participation. (Almost seems like going out of his way not to stand out.)

I haven't posted much because I haven't had much to say. How does this make me more suspicious than someone who posts a lot? I don't think I've been going out of my way not to stand out either. Otherwise, I would have just jumped on the bandwagon for wolf votes.

Jman wrote:He hasn't voted for either wolf.

You say this like everyone knew who was the wolf before the vote. You stated a suspicion, and everyone jumped on your bandwagon. I suppose just because they happened to vote for the wolf they are less suspicious. You also still don't know if my votes will turn out to be werewolves either, so I don't see how you can base an accusation on that.

Jman wrote:I've seen him active during every night cycle without posting anything.

How does posting at night remove suspicion from being on? Posting slows down at night, and its a good time to catch up on unread pages. Also, werewolves aren't the only ones who can be on at night. Besides just reading, there is PM'ing, as well as other night jobs, that do not need to be accompanied with posting.

All of these accusations can't be used to determine wolf/not wolf, and they all sound like things a wolf would try to avoid, anyways. Also, I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who can be accused of these things.
I know I won't be able to change Jman's mind, but I would warn against using the same strategy three nights in a row. Just because it worked before does not mean it will work again. Everyone can't be categorized by one or two wolves' behaviors. Voting under the same parameters is probably exactly what the wolves want you to do.

Phew, that was a long post...

How does posting at night remove suspicion from being on? Posting slows down at night, and its a good time to catch up on unread pages. Also, werewolves aren't the only ones who can be on at night. Besides just reading, there is PM'ing, as well as other night jobs, that do not need to be accompanied with posting.

Also, if he is at night in your time zone, he may be on in the day in his... just saying

Even though I generally trust jman's judgement, I'm not sure if the evidence against wquist is quite enough to warrant a lynching just yet. For now, I'm abstaining, but I'll have a vote ready by the end of the day.

Speaking of which, when does this day cycle end?

7 If everyone gets there vote in

Well, simply judging from names, NOT THE WAREWOLF seems a bit suspicious.......If anyone can confirm that he is not a wolf, please post evidence. Then again, the name seems a bit to obvious, so its not enough proof to go and lynch him by. I do however see it a bit suspicious the way wquist responded, so I think my vote goes to him. If anyone can think of better reason to lynch someone else, please tell me and provide me with proof, and I'll be glad to switch my vote.

Bandwagon ALL the people!
Which means, I'm voting for Wquist.

I wonder how many wolves aren't even participating in this...

When are them inactive guys gonna be kicked out?

danger is the person i think we should lynch. jmans logic worked before and we might as well give it another try. if it fails we could always start doing something else.

Most of those people aren't inactive technically. They just rarely post

chaosfaction wrote:7 If everyone gets there vote in

Shouldn't it be 10 since that's when we ended night yesterday?

AlphaDecay90 wrote:Shouldn't it be 10 since that's when we ended night yesterday?

In an attempt to get back on our original schedule we're ending it at 7 if nothing interesting's happening (one person with an overwhelming number of votes, etc). Otherwise it's going to 10, and I guess we'll shorten the night cycle to fix it back at 7.

Once again, TheCat100 is still out, but in their absence they submit wquist as a lynchvote.

In addition, esque has asked that I forward his lynchvote, which is directed at chartreuse.

I revoke all suspicion on wquist. You all can keep your votes if you please, but I strongly don't recommend it.


However, what I do recommend is changing our votes onto chartreuse. I don't have any outstanding suspicions, but I really don't think we should kill wquist. If anyone has a better suggestion than chartreuse just go ahead and say it.

I vote JMAN

For absolutely no definitive reason.

Slade wrote:I vote JMAN

For absolutely no definitive reason.

Very suspicious move. Perhaps hoping to bandwagon Jman?

Hi guys! I got to access a computer today. I did not read all the new pots, but I should be back home after tommorow, so hopefully I could participate more.

I wish you guys luck in my absence.

jman has spoken.

his faithful servant would like to change his vote...

FOR CHARTREUSE (sorry for not using colors...I can't seem to format any of my texts as I'm on my phone) <MODFIX'D>

I suppose I should defend myself against the no evidence against me. Well...how should I? I'm not sure. First, what evidence do you have against me? Other than the fact that I was on during the night cycle? But, if I really wanted, I could have just set my profile to hidden...

chartreuse wrote:I suppose I should defend myself against the no evidence against me. Well...how should I? I'm not sure. First, what evidence do you have against me? Other than the fact that I was on during the night cycle? But, if I really wanted, I could have just set my profile to hidden...

I'm sorry, but I have to try my best to save wquist. I just need someone to go for today, it doesn't have to be chartreuse. Nobody is giving me any input on any better options...

I won't vote, I'm not sure what is happening. Why the sudden change in votes against Chartreuse? And can I see the reasons for wquist in the first place?

I'm confused with this game.