Werewolf: Round 4

I have deviant and jman in mind and will vote for one of them in the morning.

Reason to vote for either was given by the first to accuse them this day and I find them both compelling reasons.

More want to see how others feel about the situation with those two before I cast my vote.

Orange08 brought up a good point.... a suspiciously good point. After all, the aggression in his/her is comment is most befitting a wolf . i vote for Orange08

orange08 wrote:Hah! You forgot to add yourself to that list! Also... this is a very clever way of making people believe you are an innocent villager, your tail gives you away, though!

Jman is guilty!

I figured it was kind of implied that I was on at night to see who went on, but okay.

You are quite eager to try to kill those pointing you out, so even if you kill me, my body will be discovered to be nothing more than that of a common villager and then you'll be cast in a very suspicious light.

Hence, I'll go out on a limb and vote for orange08 until a better alternative shows up.

After watching this "bicker" above, I felt it my duty to investigate...for traces of the wolf..

After some deep thought and ponder, I can see Jman's innocence (i hope) and would like to cast my vote against...orange08

Should further evidence arrive, my vote will change. But until then, let it be known. My vote is in.

Well i didnt get much solid info but i did think about how a werewolf thinks. if i where a werewolf I would target those that can figure out who the werewolf is I.E. snail, Zed di dragon, Jman, or any narhwal in general. so i believe is some form of wolf

PELIGRO wrote:Orange08 brought up a good point.... a suspiciously good point. After all, the aggression in his/her is comment is most befitting a wolf . i vote for Orange08

I don't like this logic. Can't really judge anybody on how, "Agressive," you presume they are. Going on temprament, you could assume someone would act as placid and negotiable as possible to avoid detection as a werewolf. But then, you could also reason that someone would act as confrontational and "Agressive," as possible as to seem -so- obviously wolfish that their status is doubtful. Unfortunately, as you can clearly see, this course of reasoning extends ad infinitum, making it foolish and nigh impossible to use as a means of deduction. So, with that out of the picture, is it really a great idea to lynch someone for bringing up a legitimate point?

So, while Orange might just be a wolf, the evidence is far too skimpy and misleading to draw me onto this bandwagon. Hence, my lynch vote goes to Danger, as I can only see Peligro's indictment of Orange, and exploiting the Orange/Jman split as a means of taking the notice off Sine's random indictment of Danger. Peligro is spanish for, "Danger," if anybody didn't know already.

Lets not kill off people that think,
-Cosine

I can see where this day is heading.

Well said, Cosine.

Rather than killing of people who think, we should kill of people who don't play. I will jump on the bandwagon for Danger as he is amongst that group.

That puts us at 3 for Danger and 4 for orange.

I like the logic for Danger. Let the inactive fools perish!

Changelog: Just removed my Danger vote due to his recent activity. I'm also liking Slade's logic... we shouldn't be trying to minimize damage, we should be trying to eliminate active wolves. My vote come later today... Beware wolves, I will find you!

WOW, SO sorry guys! Haven't been checking my e-mails, I had no idea this game has been going on for the past week. Well I just caught up with everything and, having read the most recent of posts, my vote's on orange08 because I don't feel they have enough evidence that it's Peligro (are we just calling him Danger now?) Secondly because I don't think it's really either one of them, but there's gotta be some kind of majority.]

WowzerAnne, there are TWO players - one named Danger and one named PELIGRO (which just happens to be Spanish for danger).

Going for Danger. There just isn't enough evidence to go after orange08 and we'll save a villager if we votekill someone that's about to get auto'd anyways.

So, wait. Our only justification for voting Danger is that Danger's name "sounds dangerous" and that he or she doesn't play?

My vote is for Orange08.

I believe Orange08's high leveled paranoid thinking is a little too paranoid... To the point where its being used to cause trouble. That's why he has my vote.

Logic? PAH! danger must hang!

Risque wrote:WowzerAnne, there are TWO players - one named Danger and one named PELIGRO (which just happens to be Spanish for danger).

Ah, okay. I somehow missed that! Well, I just RE-read everything, and even though I agree with Snail about Danger, I'm sticking to my guns on Orange08. A person who hasn't participated could be purely accidental.

Risque wrote:So, wait. Our only justification for voting Danger is that Danger's name "sounds dangerous" and that he or she doesn't play?

WowzerAnne wrote:A person who hasn't participated could be purely accidental.

It's not that we think Danger might be a wolf. This is about minimizing losses. If Danger, amongst others, don't vote by the end of the day they will die whether we lynch them or not.

Risque wrote:So, wait. Our only justification for voting Danger is that Danger's name "sounds dangerous" and that he or she doesn't play?

I'd rather lynch an inactive player today, than an active one.

It's time to lynch danger.

chaosfaction wrote:

jacobs98
I think we should teach SirGuy a lesson about how we deal with thieves in this neighbourhood.

was he kidding? perhaps, but as of now i have nothing else to go on.
i vote to lynch Jacobs98 until further evidence can be gathered

we will avenge you sirguy!

Why I most certainly was, sort of. Of course, the werewolves are the true enemies here but we cannot tolerate other lawless people, not in this crisis! May SirGuy find peace in Valhalla.

Edit: I once again lay my vote on Orange08 the vegetable. Suspicion has been raised against him and I still have my reasons for this (Dear Snail, this isn't personal. Or well, it is, but not "IRL personal" or "#gmc personal".)

-_-

In the interest of keeping myself alive, I vote for danger

x_X

Voting for the inactive rather than the truly dangerous might be a dangerous move in itself...
My vote's for orange08...self-preservation and all that.

I agree with the minimizing losses thought..
but then we're still not discovering which of the active players are werewolves.



Think guys. They know they're safe if we're voting for the inactive. If I were a wolf.. that's exactly what I would do.. divert everyone's attention away from the active players. They are low on numbers comparatively- the longer we're not hunting THEM, the better for them because they will always kill one at night.

Zed Di Dragon suggested wasting our votes on an Auto Lynch.
I suggest everyone change their vote to Zed.

Danger has now voted, thus negating all reason I had to point at him. I could pick someone new from the list of inactive players but this late in the day I doubt it would gain any momentum.

orange08, I apologize for this.

Slade, inactive players has as big a chance of being wolves as the active ones do. In fact, I'm nearly certain that there are inactive wolves; just last night Providence sent a plea to the wolves asking them to partake in the game.

Have to go with the Inactive logic... I vote for Danger

Zed- I agree

But voting for the inactives doesn't help us find the wolves that are active- I dont care if we find an inactive wolf that is getting autolnyched anyway. I want to find the beast and the wolves who killed my friend Buzz.

I never liked to bandwagon or anything, as I have an unfortunate experience with them and random number generators, but I believe cosine's logic is sound and I don't believe emotions can truly be regarded as a method of reasonably figuring out who the wolves are, and there is the reverse psychology aspect that cosine had brought up and agree with that, thus despite my hatred against bandwagons I'm sorry danger but my vote is for you